Demonstration in Paris: the Conseil d’État upholds the Bagnolet–Charenton route

Une décision sur un itinéraire ne signifie pas que toute manifestation est interdite.

Normally ne and pas wrap the verb. Before a vowel, ne becomes n’. Check which part of the sentence the negation covers. Ne … plus means “no longer”.

Selon les informations du 31 octobre au matin, la décision de la veille a été renversée.

Selon means “according to”. Put a person or organisation after it as the source. It separates facts the writer checked directly from what another body or report said. Citing a source does not turn a forecast into an accomplished fact.

Pour comprendre cette succession, comparez l’heure de publication et les mises à jour : un article exact hier peut être dépassé aujourd’hui.

Put a base-form verb after pouvoir. Peut means “can” or “may”; the conditional pourrait gives a more reserved possibility, “might”. It does not necessarily mean implementation is settled.

Pour comprendre cette succession, comparez l’heure de publication et les mises à jour : un article exact hier peut être dépassé aujourd’hui.

This is the purpose, “in order to…”. Put the base form of a verb after pour. The purpose stated here is separate from whether the effect was actually achieved.

Le Conseil d’État est la juridiction suprême de l’ordre administratif français.

Est is third-person singular and sont third-person plural of être. They express “is / are” — a state or description. If a past participle follows, it is a different structure such as the passive, so check the words that follow.

Selon RTL et Zinfos974, le Conseil d’État a annulé le 31 octobre la décision du tribunal administratif de Paris.

Le 15 octobre means “on 15 October”. Distinguish the le before a date from the le that marks a weekly habit like a weekday. Du is de + le and au is à + le, so decide the meaning from the verb and period expressions around them. Their role depends on the group: a range of dates, the date of a bulletin or another complement.

RTLとZinfos974によると、国務院は31日、パリの行政裁判所の判断を取り消しました。

As in “LCPによると”, it shows where the information comes from. What that source reported follows. It is used differently from “私にとって”, which gives one’s own opinion.

この記事は朝の確認情報で、デモの結果を伝えるものではありません。

They negate a noun and similar content. “ではありません” is the polite form and “ではない” the plain form. “成立ではありません” shows that it cannot be said to have been concluded.

経路についての判断を、すべてのデモを禁止したという意味で読むことはできません。

As in “予算について”, it shows the topic to be talked about or explained. In the form “〜についての報道”, の is added so that the group qualifies the following noun.

Conseil d’État は、行政に関する裁判で最上級に位置するフランスの機関です。

As in “税控除に関する採決”, it explains what the following noun relates to. It is close to “about” and is common in headlines and descriptions.

31日朝の報道では、前夜の判断が覆りました。

In “発表しました”, ました makes a verb polite past. The negative is “ませんでした”. Read the actual date together with the date and time in the text.

デモの経路はバニョレ門からシャラントン門までと報じられています。

と takes the content that is reported or explained. In “改定する方針だと報じました”, “改定する方針だ” is what the report said. Separating the content from who said it and how makes long sentences easier to read.